Home| IAS Exam| Bank Exams| Contact us
08th March 2010
ANALYSIS
WILL THE OPERATION MOSHTARAK WORK SUCCESSFULLY?
In Marjah, a town in the southwestern province of Helmand with a population of 80,000, the Operation Moshtarak known as Operation Together of NATO and Afghan National Army forces launched on 13th February is running into violent Taliban confrontation frequently. The world's largest opium producing province and Marjah provide funds to the Taliban around $25 million every year. The adjacent complex of canals together with residential compounds makes evasion easier, not a small facility with improvised explosive weapons. NATO has pumped in over 15,000 troops with helicopters and drones to assault Marjah and the Taliban have perplexed their calculations by continuing fighting without a break. In spite of President Hamid Karzai’s appeal to NATO forces to save civilian population, collateral deaths are growing relentlessly, with the U.S.'s high-tech electronic combat killing innocent children, women, and men in an unparalleled manner. The University of New Hampshire has diligently developed a database that seeks to account for every Afghan civilian killed by the U.S./NATO forces from the beginning of 2001 attack. The master table made available to media shows that close to 10,000 civilians have been killed by U.S./NATO military actions in Afghanistan during last nine years.  Shamefully, the data reveals that more Afghan civilians have been killed under the Obama regime from 2009 than under previous administration of George W Bush.

It requires one more month to get rid of the Taliban from the targeted areas according to the estimates of a senior British Officer. The commanders of the combined forces are aware that stability can be restored only with public faith.  Cynicism and pessimism are rightly widespread among the local people, who hate corruption and the chaotic state of affairs of the Afghan government that is expected to root out the Taliban in Helmand. The Taliban are in actual control of stable civil authority and day-to-day security according to one reliable analysis. Talks with the Taliban have been hinted by the U.S. perhaps with the hope of marginalizing their own extreme elements. But that plan may not work well because the younger Taliban leaders are hardliners. Further, it is doubtful if a centralised state can be created in a society where people for hundreds of years have been functioning on tribal culture.  Added to this, NATO may take over Marjah but it will make the supposed capture of Kandahar province, a more important Taliban stronghold than Helmand, will not be an easy task.  The U.S. prospect of creating a reshaped Afghan body politic so that it can depart within a year and a half will not be possible when civilian deaths go up and record of war crimes become bigger.

GOOGLE IS IN THE FOREGROUND FOR DIGITIZING BOOKS LEGALLY.
The hope of creating the world's largest digital library dreamt by Google remains doubtful after a New York district court pronounced that it needs more time to pass judgment on such a controversial subject.  Starting from 2004, the $200 million project commenced by scanning and digitizing of the whole libraries of four major universities, including Harvard and Oxford, and the New York Public Library. In exchange for consent to digitize the books and make ias coachingexcerpts available through their search engine, the libraries were assured a digital copy each of the books and journals. The subject embraces authors, publishers, anti-trust practices and copyright law, has been going on in a legal process from the last five years.  The Author's Guild and the Association of American Publishers joined hands to file a class action suit against Google Inc. for resorting to a massive copyright infringement for business and profit. The Google contested that use of “oddments” and “passages” of copyrighted articles were permitted for “fair use” under the law.

The authors, publishers, and libraries entered into an agreement with Google two years back to put in place a business model to reimburse the former for use of copyrighted work through Google's digital platform and the case assumed a totally new shape. The agreement incorporated out-of-print books and non-copyrighted books for free previews.  After the U.S. Justice Department held that the original agreement could be in violation of anti-trust laws, a revised agreement was filed in the court.  It would be advantageous if the final judgment gives an equitable and fine balance that protects the rights of authors and publishers, that speak to concerns about Google obtaining domination over vast digital libraries and that does not come in the way of a possible revolution in right of public to use the information. The amended settlement makes available millions of out-of-print books to researchers and readers through a search engine. The Google's digital project will very much improve public access to books. Many countries maintain that the settlement infringes the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. A rival to Google Books is being prepared by France.  With these developments, the fact that too much is at stake to be decided by a settlement than a court is the current thinking.  An all-inclusive legal framework and enactment of laws for book digitization is the need of the hour.

Archive....
Current Affairs Editorial Team : H.L. Subramania, N.G.Karan, R.Shivaram & N.Poornima
 
HOME | IAS EXAM | BANK EXAM | CONTACT US
Copyright © Jts institute Bangalore
Legal jurisdiction: Bangalore city court only